jun
23
2010

Eco Tuk B.V.

Eco Tuk world Logo

Welcome on the website of the company Eco Tuk. Eco Tuk is a Research and Developing company founded at December 22, 2009 and seated in Arnhem, the Netherlands.

The main focus of Eco Tuk lies within developing sustainable solutions for the global mobility sector. Eco Tuk’s first sustainable solution is the development of the LPG conversion kit, which reduces the 2-stroke auto-rickshaws fuel costs by approximately 50% and CO2 pollution with approximately 40%.

sep
1
2010

Ten Facts On LPG Conversions

Savings on fuel
LPG offers huge financial savings when compared with petrol, there is no denying this fact. However, LPG as fuel is not as efficient as petrol in terms of miles per gallon, so the best way to calculate savings is to estimate the cost of driving 1000 miles on petrol compared with 1000 miles on LGP fuel.

Fuel saving for drivers of commercial vehicles can be astronomical . A commercial vehicle with an annual mileage of 50,000 miles can expect annual fuel costs of £6,500 (petrol) or £5,356 (diesel). The average cost to cover the same number of miles with LPG is just £3,744.

Costs no more to insure
Many motorists believe that an LPG converted vehicle will be more expensive to insure. However, a survey carried out by the LPG Association (LPGA), essentially showed that this isn’t the case. The top 20 insurance companies all said they insure a LPG converted car so long as the LPG conversion had been carried out by an LPG approved installer. Only two insurers advised they would charge an extra premium.

LPG is substantially safer than petrol or diesel
LPG gas is substantially safer to use than diesel or petrol according to the LPG Association (LPGA). This is mainly due to the fact that the fuel is stored in a robust fuel tank, which is tested to rigorous standards. LPG tanks also shut down the gas supply if you have an accident.

Filling up has never been easier
Traditional petrol pumps work much in the same way as LPG pumps and all LPG stations are fairly similar in the way they do things. Most LPG pumps have clear diagrams to help on your first visit and it’s impossible to put diesel or petrol in your LPG tank by mistake.

LPG is popular worldwide
Travelling in an LPG vehicle can almost halve the cost of travelling in a petrol-powered car. LPG is readily available in Europe, however it is more commonly known as Autogas or GPL. When you are in the station forecourt in Europe the pump will normally be marked Autogas and is located separately from the petrol and diesel pumps.

LPG is also extremely popular in Australia, The Netherlands, Italy, Serbia, Poland, Hong Kong, Korea and India. The former Soviet republic of Armenia may, however, be the world leader in autogas use.

Reduced maintenance levels
Owners of LPG cars experience an overall reduction in engine wear and LPG is clean burning and contains no lead or carbon deposits. Maintenance costs on spark plugs, pistons, rings and valves are also reduced.

Government grants available
The Government are offering grants to car owners, fleets and businesses who consider conversion to LPG or other environmentally friendly alternative fuels.

No loss of performance
Many car owners believe that converting to LPG will lower the cars performance – this is a common misconception. The truth is that if there is any change in performance from LPG it will be negligible and most drivers would be unlikely to detect the difference.

Environment
Traditional fuels such as petrol and diesel are constantly taking the blame from the Government as the primary cause of low quality air conditions in the UK. Automotive vehicles emit a mixture of harmful gases including Sulphur Dioxide Hydrocarbons, Micro particulates and Nitric Oxides to name but a few.

Poor air quality, due to high levels of toxic gases, imposes social costs that are mainly associated with health care costs. Health problems resulting from these emissions include Congestive heart failure, Respiratory problems and Bronchitis, which all relate to poor air quality.

LPG cars produce substantially less emissions according to research carried out by the Norfolk County Council. Individuals and organisations that adopt the environmentally-friendly alternative automotive fuels and technologies are not only generating cost savings for themselves but also for the larger society.

Source: http://www.buzzle.com/articles/ten-facts-lpg-conversions.html

aug
31
2010

How a supplier calculates the cost of LPG to an end user?

In order to calculate the retail price of LPG, the reseller makes use of the following input:

* the current wholesale market price of LPG (quoted in $US);
* the cost per tonne payable to the terminal provider for providing the facility to store and collect the LPG;
* primary distribution costs from the terminal to the supplier’s depot;
* secondary distribution costs from the depot to the end user;
* overhead operating costs;
* if the supplier has provided the tank and installed it free of charge they will recoup these costs within the litre rate;
* the estimated annual usage;
* a margin or profit over and above the core costs

Source: http://www.lpg-solutions.co.uk/facts.html

aug
26
2010

The Kyoto Protocol

The Kyoto Protocol to the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change strengthens the international response to climate change. Adopted by consensus at the third session of the Conference of the Parties (COP3) in December 1997, it contains legally binding emissions targets for Annex I (developed) countries for the post-2000 period. The EU and its Member States ratified the Kyoto Protocol in late May 2002.

By arresting and reversing the upward trend in greenhouse gas emissions that started in these countries 150 years ago, the Protocol promises to move the international community one step closer to achieving the Convention’s ultimate objective of preventing “dangerous anthropogenic [man-made] interference with the climate system”.

The developed countries commit themselves to reducing their collective emissions of six key greenhouse gases by at least 5%. This group target will be achieved through cuts of 8% by Switzerland, most Central and East European states, and the European Union (the EU will meet its target by distributing different rates among its member states); 7% by the US; and 6% by Canada, Hungary, Japan, and Poland. Russia, New Zealand, and Ukraine are to stabilize their emissions, while Norway may increase emissions by up to 1%, Australia by up to 8%, and Iceland 10%. The six gases are to be combined in a “basket”, with reductions in individual gases translated into “CO2 equivalents” that are then added up to produce a single figure.

Each country’s emissions target must be achieved by the period 2008-2012. It will be calculated as an average over the five years. “Demonstrable progress” towards meeting the target must be made by 2005. Cuts in the three most important gases – carbon dioxide (CO2), methane (CH4), and nitrous oxide (N20) – will be measured against a base year of 1990 (with exceptions for some countries with economies in transition).

Cuts in three long-lived industrial gases – hydrofluorocarbons (HFCs), perfluorocarbons (PFCs), and sulphur hexafluoride (SF6) – can be measured against either a 1990 or 1995 baseline. (A major group of industrial gases, chlorofluorocarbons, or CFCs, are dealt with under the 1987 Montreal Protocol on Substances that Deplete the Ozone Layer.)

Actual emission reductions will be much larger than 5%. Compared with emissions levels projected for the year 2000, the richest industrialized countries (OECD members) will need to reduce their collective output by about 10%. This is because many of these countries will not succeed in meeting their earlier non-binding aim of returning emissions to 1990 levels by the year 2000; their emissions have in fact risen since 1990. While the countries with economies in transition have experienced falling emissions since 1990, this trend is now reversing.

Therefore, for the developed countries as a whole, the 5% Protocol target represents an actual cut of around 20% when compared with the emissions levels that are projected for 2010 if no emissions-control measures are adopted.

Countries have a certain degree of flexibility in how they make and measure their emissions reductions. In particular, an international “emissions trading” regime is established allowing industrialized countries to buy and sell emissions credits amongst themselves. They will also be able to acquire “emission reduction units” by financing certain kinds of projects in other developed countries through a mechanism known as Joint Implementation. In addition, a “Clean Development Mechanism” for promoting sustainable development enables industrialized countries to finance emissions-reduction projects in developing countries and receive credit for doing so.

They pursue emissions cuts in a wide range of economic sectors. The Protocol encourages governments to cooperate with one another, improve energy efficiency, reform the energy and transportation sectors, promote renewable forms of energy, phase out inappropriate fiscal measures and market imperfections, limit methane emissions from waste management and energy systems, and protect forests and other carbon “sinks”.

The Protocol advances the implementation of existing commitments by all countries. Under the Convention, both developed and developing countries agree to take measures to limit emissions and promote adaptation to future climate change impacts; submit information on their national climate change programmes and inventories; promote technology transfer; cooperate on scientific and technical research; and promote public awareness, education, and training. The Protocol also reiterates the need to provide “new and additional” financial resources to meet the “agreed full costs” incurred by developing countries in carrying out these commitments.

The Conference of the Parties (COP) of the Convention also serves as the meeting of the Parties (MOP) for the Protocol. This structure has been established to facilitate the management of the intergovernmental process. Parties to the Convention that are not Parties to the Protocol will be able to participate in Protocol-related meetings as observers.

The agreement is being reviewed. The Parties will take “appropriate action” on the basis of the best available scientific, technical, and socio-economic information. Talks on commitments for the post-2012 period are on-going

The Kyoto Protocol

Source: http://ec.europa.eu/environment/climat/kyoto.htm

aug
12
2010

Eco Tuk at the BNR Duurzaam Radio show

The link below starts the Radio Show of BNR Duurzaam featuring Frank Schouten & Ruben Antvelink talking about their company Eco Tuk B.V.

BNR duurzaam Eco Tuk Radio Show

aug
5
2010

Why to Invest in India?

India is a big country, 88 times  the size of the Netherlands. Now days the governmental control on foreign business and investments are reduced  quit a lot and the privatisation process proceeds more and more. The Indian economy has an estimated growth of 6% on yearly bases. Most of the People are fairly well educated, but still 40% of the society is illiterate and 25% of all inhabitants are living under the poverty line. The national debt is about 60% of the gross national product, which can seen as worrisome. The economy is globally divided as followed:

  • 24% Agriculture;
  • 28% Industrial;
  • 48% Services.

The import value is $65 billion and the export value is $53 billion. The main trade partners of India are:

  • United States of America;
  • Belgium;
  • Great Brittan;
  • Germany;
  • Japan.

The main import products are related to oil products, capital goods, gems, gold, silver and electronics.

The Netherlands exports for €547 million to India, which mainly consists out of Chemicals, machinery and agriculture. The value of import is around €1 billion. Most interesting markets for Dutch businesses are:

  • Agriculture;
  • Construction;
  • Infrastructure;
  • Water;
  • ICT;
  • Health care.

More and more international businesses are delocalizing their business to India. Most of the international investments are in information technology, business processes, research and development. After the US and China, India is the most attractive country to invest in.

Language barriers are rare during business  conversations, because they often speak fluent English. There are cultural indifferences, but business man are wearing suits and ties.

Source: www.export.nl

aug
2
2010

The Bottom of the Pyramid (BoP)

The bottom of the pyramid is the largest, but also poorest socio-economic group in several societies around the globe. This fact leaves an astonishing 2.5 billion people who live on less than $2.50 a day. The  “bottom of the pyramid” model is used mostly by people who are developing new models of doing business focused on this particular group, often using new technology. The LPG-LDI conversion kit of Eco Tuk B.V. clearly fits the profile by creating a fuel cost saving product, which adds business value to the Auto-Rickshaw drivers. This group earns about $2,- a day, which is mainly caused by the large percentage of fuel costs on its profit. Another example of a BoP initiative is Micro-credit. The BoP is often based on social/responsible Entrepreneurship.

The tree pillars on which this model is based are as followed:

  • Availability
  • Affordability
  • Accessibility

The BoP sees this society as Value-Conscious Consumers or Innovative Entrepreneurs.

The following link shows a interesting  document about this subject:

Unhabitat – Bottom of the Pyramid Approaches for Urban Sustainability

jul
29
2010

LPG cheapest in India

NEW DELHI: A look at the street prices in neighbouring countries shows petrol and diesel sold in India — which is of superior quality — almost at par, while kerosene and cooking gas rates turn out to be the cheapest in South Asia.

After equalizing various currencies at their dollar exchange rate prevailing on June 4, in terms of Indian rupee the cost of a litre of petrol in Kathmandu was Rs 51.36 a litre on June 1 against Rs 51.43 in Delhi after the June 25 price revision. In comparison, the fuel sold for Rs 49.72 a litre in Dhaka and Rs 47.24 in Colombo but turned out cheaper in Karachi at Rs 36.41.

While each litre of superior Euro-IV diesel costs Rs 40.10 in Delhi, the main transportation fuel sells for Rs 41.44 in Karachi, Rs 39.24 in Kathmandu, Rs 29.90 in Colombo and Rs 29.43 in Dhaka. Industry analysts attributed the price differential to the difference in quality, with the Indian market moving to cleaner Euro-III and IV supplies. The difference in tax structures too contribute to the marginal difference in prices.

But prices in India shine when it comes to cooking gas and kerosene. Against the price of Rs 345.35 for a cylinder in Delhi, households pay Rs 577.18 in Karachi, Rs 782.84 in Kathmandu, Rs 822.65 in Colombo and Rs 537.37 in Dhaka. After the hike, a litre of kerosene costs Rs 12.32 in Delhi, but will cost Rs 39.24 in Kathmandu, Rs 35.97 in Karachi, Rs 29.43 in Dhaka and Rs 21 in Colombo.

Source: The Times of India

jul
28
2010

Quantum Alternative Fuel Systems its Distribution for India

Quantum Fuel Systems Technologies Worldwide has  an agreement for the marketing, sales, and distribution in India of its leading alternative fuel vehicle products and systems for compressed natural gas (CNG), blends of natural gas and hydrogen, and liquid petroleum gas (LPG).